Indefinite Metric and BRST Cohomology
From Scholarpedia
| Carlo Maria Becchi and Camillo Imbimbo (2008), Scholarpedia, 3(11):7135. | revision #50013 [link to/cite this article] | |||||||||||||||||||
Curator: Dr. Carlo Maria Becchi, Genoa University, Italy
Curator: Dr. Camillo Imbimbo, Genoa University, Italy
Indefinite Metric and BRST Cohomology
The standard construction of an indefinite-metric space is based on a Hilbert space and on the identification of a metric Hermitian operator
with vanishing kernel. The pseudo inner product in the indefinite-metric space
is defined by
where the angle brackets define the pseudo inner product in the indefinite-metric space while the round ones define the inner product in the Hilbert space. Furthermore the pseudo-adjoint of an operator
is defined by
In the B-F oscillator model the total Hilbert space is identified with the Cartesian product of the fermionic and bosonic Fock space. The metric Hermitian operator
is identified using the Pseudo-Hermiticity condition for
which is equivalent to the Hilbert space relation
One can solve this relation factorizing
into the product of a bosonic operator
and a fermionic one
,
finding
Given
it is easy to verify that
and hence
Furthermore one verifies immediately that both
and
are Pseudo-Hermitian operators.
Further important points are:
- The Fock vacuum
is an eigenvector of
and has positive pseudo-norm,
. Furthermore
.
- Among the single-particle states,
and
have positive pseudo-norm while
and
have negative pseudo-norm.
- Among the single-particle states,
and
. These relations follow from the nilpotency of
since
and
.
- In general the states of
are pseudo-orthogonal to those of
since
is pseudo-Hermitian.
To identify
with the physical invariant subspace of the indefinite-metric Fock space one has to address two issues:
- Understanding the physical meaning of states pseudo-orthogonal to the rest of
such as those in
.
- Showing that the states in
have non-negative norm.
Regarding the first issue, one observes that adding arbitrary states in
to states in
does not change their pseudo-inner products. Therefore, from the point of view of the physical interpretation based on the probabilistic interpretation of the pseudo-inner product, two states in
whose difference belongs to
must be considered equivalent
Hence the linear space of physical states
must be identified with
, which is the linear space of equivalence classes of vectors in
.
As for the second question, if the inner product
induced on
by the pseudo-inner product on the original space is definite positive,
is a Hilbert space. This has to
be investigated on a case by case basis.
For the B-F model one proves directly that
is the direct sum of
and the linear span of the vacuum vector
. Therefore
coincides with the equivalence class of the vacuum
which is a Hilbert space since the pseudo-norm of this state is positive.
